** single-gpage.php **
** content-gpage.php **


Nasal Discharge, Obstruction, Chronic Rhinosinusitis

  

Nasal discharge is a very common problem, especially amongst children. Policy on Cchronic Rhinosinusitis


Chronic Rhinosinusitis

1. Category: Threshold

Threshold procedures and therapies are those in which a clinical threshold has been set which needs to be met before funding will be made available for treatment.

For patients who DO NOT meet the eligibility criteria, the ICB will only consider funding the treatment if an Individual Funding Request (IFR) detailing the patient’s clinical presentation is submitted to the ICB

2. Background

This policy is based on NHS England’s Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) recommendations: https://ebi.aomrc.org.uk/interventions/surgical-intervention-for-chronic-rhinosinusitis/

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is defined as inflammation (swelling) of the nasal sinuses that lasts longer than 12 weeks.

The sinuses are mucus secreting, air filled cavities in the face and headthat drain into the nose; their normal function may be disrupted by environmental, infectious or inflammatory conditions which damage the epithelial lining and disturb the balance of the natural microbial community

Patients report a number of symptoms including nasal blockage, discharge, alteration to smell, and facial pressure or pain

They often have a relapsing course, with recurrence after treatment commonplace. Absenteeism and presenteeism are widespread

It is a common chronic condition that affects approximately 11% of adults and has a significant detrimental effect on the quality of life of those affected, thus creating a significant disease burden.

CRS as a term encompasses a wide range of phenotypes but can broadly be divided into two main types:

  • Chronic rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis (CRSwNP)
  • Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Nasal Polyposis (CRSsNP)

First-line treatment is with appropriate medical therapy, which should include intranasal steroids and nasal saline irrigation

In the case of CRSwNP a trial of a short course of oral steroids should also be considered

Where first-line medical treatment has failed patients should be referred for diagnostic confirmation and they then may be considered for endoscopic sinus surgery

This involves surgery using a telescope via the nasal cavity to open the sinuses and, if present, remove nasal polyps, both improving the effectiveness of ongoing medical therapy and relieving obstruction

The surgery is usually undertaken under general anaesthetic as a day-case procedure in otherwise healthy individuals

This policy applies to adults and children

3. Indication

There is a strong evidence base and expert consensus opinion to support the medical management of chronic rhinosinusitis with intranasal steroids and nasal saline irrigation as a first-line treatment

They are low cost and low risk, with newer generations of nasal steroids safe for long-term use owing to minimal systemic absorption

There is also evidence to support the trial of oral steroids, but only when nasal polyposis is present

The benefits of oral steroids should be balanced against the risks when considering repeated courses

A Cochrane review has demonstrated the benefits of oral steroids can last up to three months; however the risks and side effects must be balanced against benefit for the patient with repeated courses

There is evidence to support that when endoscopic sinus surgery is performed in appropriately selected patients (as outlined in this policy), it will lead to a significant and durable improvement in symptoms

There is also evidence that patients who undergo surgery early in their disease course will have a longer and more beneficial impact from the surgery

All national and international guidelines support consideration of endoscopic sinus surgery once appropriate medical therapy has failed

It is important to note that there is currently a UK multidisciplinary randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing medical therapy with surgery in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis (MACRO Trial: https://www.themacroprogramme.org.uk). The outcome of this trial may lead to modification of policy for sinus surgery in due course

Endoscopic sinus surgery is generally safe and low risk. Risks include bleeding, infection, scar tissue formation, and very rarely, orbital injury or cerebrospinal fluid leak (with associated risk of meningitis)

Patients should be counselled that there is a risk of recurrent symptoms and that ongoing medical treatment is normally required to maintain symptom improvement after endoscopic sinus surgery

Patients are eligible to be referred for specialist secondary care assessment in any of the following circumstances:

  • A clinical diagnosis of CRS has been made (as set out in RCS/ENT-UK Commissioning guidance) in primary care and patient still has moderate / severe symptoms after a 3-monthtrial of intranasal steroids and nasal saline irrigation AND
  • In addition, for patients with bilateral nasal polyps there has been no improvement in symptoms 4 weeks after a trial of 5-10 days of oral steroids (0.5mg/kg to a max of 60 mg) OR
  • Patient has nasal symptoms with an unclear diagnosis in primary care OR
  • Any patient with unilateral symptoms or clinical findings, orbital, or neurological features should be referred urgently or via 2-week wait depending on local pathways

No investigations, apart from clinical assessment, should take place in primary care or be a pre-requisite for referral to secondary care (e.g. X-ray, CT scan). There is no role for prolonged courses of antibiotics in primary care

4. Eligibility Criteria

Patients can be considered for endoscopic sinus surgery when the following criteria are met:

  • A diagnosis of CRS has been confirmed from clinical history and nasal endoscopy and / or CT scan AND
  • Disease-specific symptom patient reported outcome measure confirms moderate to severe symptoms e.g. Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) after trial of appropriate medical therapy (including counselling on technique and compliance) as outlined in RCS/ENT-UK commissioning guidance ‘Recommended secondary care pathway’ AND
  • Pre-operative CT sinus scan has been performed and confirms presence of CRS. Note: a CT sinus scan does not necessarily need to be repeated if performed sooner in the patient’s pathway AND
  • Patient and clinician have undertaken appropriate shared decision making consultation regarding undergoing surgery including discussion of risks and benefits of surgical intervention OR
  • In patients with recurrent acute sinusitis, nasal examination is likely to be relatively normal.

Ideally, the diagnosis should be confirmed during an acute attack if possible, by nasal endoscopy and/or a CT sinus scan

There are a number of medical conditions whereby endoscopic sinus surgery may be required outside the above criteria and in these cases they should not be subjected to the above criteria and continue to be routinely funded:

  • Any suspected or confirmed neoplasia
  • Emergency presentations with complications of sinusitis (e.g. orbital abscess, subdural or intracranial abscess)
  • Patients with immunodeficiency
  • Fungal Sinusitis
  • Patients with conditions such as Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia, Cystic Fibrosis or NSAID-Eosinophilic Respiratory Disease (NSAID-ERD, Samter’sTriad Aspirin Sensitivity, Asthma, CRS)
  • Treatment with topical and / or oral steroids contra-indicated.
  • As part of surgical access or dissection to treat non-sinus disease (e.g. pituitary surgery, orbital decompression for eye disease, nasolacrimal surgery).

For patients who DO NOT meet the eligibility criteria, the ICB will only consider funding the treatment if an Individual Funding Request (IFR) detailing the patient’s clinical presentation is submitted to the ICB.

5. Guidance/References

Surgical intervention for chronic rhinosinusitis

Royal College of Surgeons (2016) Commissioning Guide: Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

NICE Clinical Knowledge Summary – Sinusitis

Hastan D, Fokkens WJ, Bachert C, et al. Chronic rhinosinusitis in europe- an underestimated disease. A GA(2)LEN study. Allergy. 2011;66(9):1216-1223. doi: 10.1111/j.1398- 9995.2011.02646.x [doi].

Orlandi RR, Kingdom TT, Hwang PH, et al. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016;6 Suppl 1:22. doi: 10.1002/alr.21695 [doi].

Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, et al. EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology. 2012;50(1):1-12. doi: 10.4193/Rhino50E2 [doi].

(Visited 2,081 times, 244 visits today)

Leave feedback